Howard Chu wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:
>
> Quoting Dieter Klünter <dieter(a)dkluenter.de>:
>>
>> The attribute type is openLDAPaci. The model is based on
>>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-08
>>
>
> Does this FAQ-O-Matic still represent the current situation regarding
> the semantics and not recommended for general use?
Yes.
Given the power of OpenLDAP ACLs in the normal configuration I also do not see
any real need for in-directory ACLs anymore. set-based ACLs could be a bit
faster though (see my other posting). :-)
Ciao, Michael.