"Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de schrieb am 03.09.2020
um 08:29 in Nachricht 5F508D2D020000A10003B140@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de:
Dieter Klünter dieter@dkluenter.de schrieb am 02.09.2020 um 19:04 in
Nachricht 20200902190443.664d1d35@pink.fritz.box:
Am Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:11:56 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hopp Olaf.Hopp@kit.edu:
Hi everybody,
we are at the point of reorganising our LDAP. Currently we only have posixGroups, but in future we also want to support groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames My question what is the common sense of usage ? groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames ?
I know your answers, you will say "it depends on your applications" but currently I have no application using it. All my current applications use my posixGroups. I just want to extend my LDAP for future use cases.
So what to take : groupOf Names or groupOfUniqueNames besides posixGroup ?
I would vote for groupOfnames. If you prefer groupOfUniqueNames you should provide uniqueness.
https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/GroupOfUniqueNames%20vs%20groupOfNames https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/UniqueMember
The use of posixgroup depends on your requirements.
Actually I had never considered adding suplicates to a groupOfNames, mostly
s/suplicates/duplicates/ # sorry
because I cannot imaging a use case; anyone have a usew case?
-Dieter
-- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://sys4.de GPG Key ID: E9ED159B 53°37'09,95"N 10°08'02,42"E