On Nov 6, 2013, at 14:26, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 6:48 PM +0000 "Jancewicz,
Russell" <russell.jancewicz(a)uconn.edu> wrote:
> Just before turning to this list i gave one last shot in the dark attempt
> running my query using the rootDN. This produced the expected results.
> When queried with a typical account DN my system was transmitting around
> 2.0Mbps to the remote client. When queried with the rootDN my system was
> transmitting around 100Mbps to the client.
The rootdn bypasses all ACL evaluation. Do you have complex ACLs?
Architect - Server
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
The system currently has around 30 olcAccess stanzas, the majority of which utilize the
set notation to grant access based on groups.
I decided it might be wise to test the speed of the search using ldapi:/// and the account
and it does appear to suffer from the same latency issues, so I this does likely stem from
Is there any cpu tuning or ACL tuning I should do to improve the overall response time?
I haven't adjusted the stock threads and am running on a virtual machine with 2 VCPUs
(though i suspect a single request would only spawn a single thread).
with regard to ACLs would it be better to use groups or individual olcAccess lines per
-Russell J. Jancewicz
University of Connecticut