Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I perhaps should have flagged this earlier, but I wanted to actually
> have the test to prove it.
> The 'member' attribute on the group is wrong, most likely because such a
> subtree rename would never cause the memberOf module to fire and notice
> that this needs updating.
Yes, slapo-memberof(5) does not consider the possibility of a subtree
rename, and thus takes no care of it.
Would deploying slapo-refint be of help here?