On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Howard Chu wrote:
> See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masarati-ldap-deref
Was going to reply but Michael beat me to it. Reiterating all the points
Michael made. There is no good reason to use memberUid or uniqueMember in
LDAP, both of these schema elements are deeply flawed.
thanks to both of you of bringing this up once more.
I was always intending to ask what the original use case for groupOfUniqueNames
actually was as I totally fail to see the point in the uniqueMember attributes.
I see lots of people using it just because "oh yeas of course we want to
have unique members".
Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH
Email: ck(a)cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2
Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden
Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer