On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:48:06PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Ondrej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> schrieb am 28.06.2017 um
> this is intended and how the issue in ITS#6545 has been fixed.
> The operation you are looking at has removed some values, then added
> other values for the same attribute straight away as another modify
> within the same op.
What would break if those "Og==" lines were omitted?
ITS#6545: interrupted replication/potential desynchronisation, depending
on the operation. See the related changes to the test suite (test063).
Senior Software Engineer
Symas Corporation http://www.symas.com
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP