I agree with that, I've been using delta-syncrepl here for a while and its much more reliable than syncrepl IMO. I did not found any consistency issue with the replication so far.
Thanks,
Matheus Morais
2011/4/27 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com
--On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:01 PM +0200 Michael Ströder < michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
Correct.
Couldn't this be the cause for delta-syncrepl to seem more reliable than normal syncrepl (without slapo-accesslog)?
I don't think so, because that is on the master, not on the replicas. Replicas still get changes in the order they were written to the master (supposedly anyhow. ;) ).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
openldap-technical@openldap.org