2017-10-13 16:25 GMT+02:00 Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com>:
Dieter Klünter wrote:
> slapo-unique(5) plus slapo-constraint(5)
Interesting, I hadn't that in mind. Unfortunately I think Michael is right
that using a constraint in this scenario won't work. But I have other uses
for slapo-contraint in mind already.
IMHO this does not work without adding all possible values to at
one of the attributes *or* SUP-ing all attribute values from a common
How would attribute inheritance tie into this? I'm relatively free in
modifying our ldap schema so making mailAlias SUP mail would be possible.