On 09/21/2009 02:34 AM, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:

Hello I noticed today that my syncrepl consumer was not up to date with the last change contained in the provider. (I am using slapd 2.4.11-1 from debian )

Hi,

Many replication related bugs have been corrected since 2.4.11, which is a rather old release now. This bug may well be fixed in the latest version 2.4.18.

I recommend you try this latest release. I think you will find debian packages available either on backports or from third parties.

Hope this helps, Jonathan

Looking at /var/log/syslog I see

Sep 16 13:49:37 ur slapd[8172]: syncrepl_entry: rid=100 be_search (0) Sep 16 13:49:37 ur slapd[8172]: syncrepl_entry: rid=100 dc=webmail,ou=friends.openforce.com,ou=CNAME,dc=openforce.com,ou=private,ou=dns,dc=openforce,dc=com

Sep 16 13:49:37 ur slapd[8172]: syncrepl_entry: rid=100 be_modrdn (32) Sep 16 13:49:37 ur slapd[8172]: do_syncrepl: rid=100 quitting

and in debug mode

bdb_modrdn: new parent "ou=friends.openforce.com,ou=CNAME,dc=openforce.com,ou=private,ou=dns,dc=openforce,dc=com"

requested... bdb_dn2entry("ou=friends.openforce.com,ou=cname,dc=openforce.com,ou=private,ou=dns,dc=openforce,dc=com")

=> bdb_dn2id("ou=friends.openforce.com,ou=cname,dc=openforce.com,ou=private,ou=dns,dc=openforce,dc=com")

<= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30990) bdb_modrdn: newSup(ndn=ou=friends.openforce.com,ou=cname,dc=openforce.com,ou=private,ou=dns,dc=openforce,dc=com)

not here!

see the cname/CNAME case difference ? the provider dn is indeed written CNAME.

EK