On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:03 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli <
marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Quanah,
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, October 29, 2012 8:52 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli
> <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If I try to configure a second replica configration targeted directly to
> (in example) to ou=ou3, then that ou get replicated.
>
> Any help/advice is welcome.
>
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> You have not provided any useful information with which to help you, so
> there is not really any advice one can offer you. I.e., you have not
> provided the configuration you are using on your master and replicas in
> the scenario where you have multiple DBs.
>
>
> You are absolutely right and I'm aware of it...
> The problem is in this case I can't provide any (even similar
> to)real configuration. Both from technical limitation (remote server
> with no possibility of copy/paste) and corporate policy*.
>
> * Continuing experimenting I found also 2 or 3 cases in which I'm able to
> crash OL 2.4.33 (in one case by simply slapadding using back-mdb) but I
> CAN'T provide any material to file a "valid" ITS. I'm sorry about
that.
>
Hi Marco,
Your corporate policy sounds so severe, I'm surprised you can even send
email indicating you have faced any issues. Without an ability to provide
useful information, I don't believe there is any way anyone can help you.
I would suggest you find a way to comply with your corporate policy while
providing useful information. Since I don't know what that policy is, it
is hard to know what you might do, but I'd hope you could supply your
configs minus any passwords and specific schema/attrs or something (i.e.,
make generic configs that illustrate the issues you are facing). That's
what I generally do.
If you require confidentiality, I would suggest a support agreement with
Symas that includes an NDA.
Quanah,
I appreciate you always answering my requests, but in this case my only
question was if the problem I was facing is a known issue (at least in
OL2.3 we know it was). If not, it could be my fault in the configuration.
Maybe someone had a similar problem and could share his experience.
By not being able to provide useful configuration snippets, I *have not*
asked for a specific help.
With your answers, do I have to assume that with OL2.4.x you never faced a
problem syncrepl-ing a tree composed by multiple db's, testing both
scenarios (more or less) similar to the two I presented from a (very)
high-level-view perspective?
Thanks again
Marco