Anyone know if this file is still working in el9? Looks like if I put SLAPD_URLS it is not read.
/etc/sysconfig/slapd
Marc wrote:
Anyone know if this file is still working in el9? Looks like if I put SLAPD_URLS it is not read.
/etc/sysconfig/slapd
That's a question for Red Hat. No one on the OpenLDAP Project has anything to do with that.
Anyone know if this file is still working in el9? Looks like if I put
SLAPD_URLS it is not read.
/etc/sysconfig/slapd
That's a question for Red Hat. No one on the OpenLDAP Project has anything to do with that.
Yes I already reported it (I think) don't even know where to report for el9 at this bugzilla. Just wondering if I was crazy or others noticed the same.
Hi,
in RedHat 7 the file /usr/lib/systemd/system/slapd.service contains:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slapd -u ldap -h ${SLAPD_URLS} $SLAPD_OPTIONS
In RedHat 9 the file /usr/lib/systemd/system/slapd.service contains:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slapd -u ldap -h "ldap:/// ldaps:/// ldapi:///"
So the urls are directly configured there and not via a variable. The file /etc/sysconfig/slapd doesn't exist.
Am 21.05.2024 um 00:10 schrieb Marc:
Anyone know if this file is still working in el9? Looks like if I put
SLAPD_URLS it is not read.
/etc/sysconfig/slapd
That's a question for Red Hat. No one on the OpenLDAP Project has anything to do with that.
Yes I already reported it (I think) don't even know where to report for el9 at this bugzilla. Just wondering if I was crazy or others noticed the same.
I don't really get what is wrong with how it was:
"As I mentioned already, use systemd drop-in file (see `man 5 systemd.unit` for more details). Or use `systemctl edit --full slapd.service`."
in RedHat 7 the file /usr/lib/systemd/system/slapd.service contains:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slapd -u ldap -h ${SLAPD_URLS} $SLAPD_OPTIONS
In RedHat 9 the file /usr/lib/systemd/system/slapd.service contains:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slapd -u ldap -h "ldap:/// ldaps:/// ldapi:///"
So the urls are directly configured there and not via a variable. The file /etc/sysconfig/slapd doesn't exist.
Am 21.05.2024 um 00:10 schrieb Marc:
Anyone know if this file is still working in el9? Looks like if I put
SLAPD_URLS it is not read.
/etc/sysconfig/slapd
That's a question for Red Hat. No one on the OpenLDAP Project has anything to do with that.
Yes I already reported it (I think) don't even know where to report for
el9 at this bugzilla. Just wondering if I was crazy or others noticed the same.
-- Viele Gruesse,
Dirk Kastens Universitaet Osnabrueck, Rechenzentrum (Computer Center) Nelson-Mandela-Str. 4, 49076 Osnabrueck, Germany Tel.: +49-541-969-2347, FAX: -2470
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 9:31 PM +0000 Marc Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu wrote:
I don't really get what is wrong with how it was:
"As I mentioned already, use systemd drop-in file (see `man 5 systemd.unit` for more details). Or use `systemctl edit --full slapd.service`."
As previously mentioned, you will need to ask RedHat their reasoning.
--Quanah
I don't really get what is wrong with how it was:
"As I mentioned already, use systemd drop-in file (see `man 5 systemd.unit` for more details). Or use `systemctl edit --full slapd.service`."
As previously mentioned, you will need to ask RedHat their reasoning.
The quote is part of the answer of redhat. I am not sure if it makes sense to ask any further there. Especially since I am not really familiar with this transition wanting to run everything via this systemd.
--On Thursday, May 23, 2024 11:33 PM +0000 Marc Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu wrote:
I don't really get what is wrong with how it was:
"As I mentioned already, use systemd drop-in file (see `man 5 systemd.unit` for more details). Or use `systemctl edit --full slapd.service`."
As previously mentioned, you will need to ask RedHat their reasoning.
The quote is part of the answer of redhat. I am not sure if it makes sense to ask any further there. Especially since I am not really familiar with this transition wanting to run everything via this systemd.
Ah, ok... that's an odd response. Having it so you can configure how ldap should listen should be a trivial override like it was before IMHO.
--Quanah
openldap-technical@openldap.org