--On Friday, October 23, 2015 1:15 PM -0700 Jason Whitener <jwhitene(a)pcc.edu&gt; wrote: > > If I had a multi-valued attribute like > cn: var0:value > cn: var2:value > cn: var3:value I think you're looking for the valsort overlay. Read the man page for slapo-valsort

Howard, Am 24.10.2015 um 07:24 Uhr schrieb Howard Chu: > Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> --On Friday, October 23, 2015 1:15 PM -0700 Jason Whitener >> <jwhitene(a)pcc.edu&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> >>> If I had a multi-valued attribute like >>> cn: var0:value >>> cn: var2:value >>> cn: var3:value >> >> I think you're looking for the valsort overlay. Read the man page for >> slapo-valsort > > If each of those are just arbitrary tags, and not for ordering purposes, > then just using an attribute tag might be the better option. > > cn;var0: value > cn;var2: value > cn;var3: value > regarding LDAP and tags I only found this RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3866 But it is about languages tags only. Section 1.3 speaks about "cn;x-bar", so this is for arbitrary tags? Is this what you meant or can you point me to something else?

Marc Patermann wrote: > Howard, > > Am 24.10.2015 um 07:24 Uhr schrieb Howard Chu: > >> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >> >>> --On Friday, October 23, 2015 1:15 PM -0700 Jason Whitener >>> <jwhitene(a)pcc.edu&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> If I had a multi-valued attribute like >>>> cn: var0:value >>>> cn: var2:value >>>> cn: var3:value >>>> >>> >>> I think you're looking for the valsort overlay. Read the man page for >>> slapo-valsort >>> >> >> If each of those are just arbitrary tags, and not for ordering purposes, >> then just using an attribute tag might be the better option. >> >> cn;var0: value >> cn;var2: value >> cn;var3: value >> >> regarding LDAP and tags I only found this RFC: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3866 > > But it is about languages tags only. Section 1.3 speaks about "cn;x-bar", > so > this is for arbitrary tags? > Is this what you meant or can you point me to something else? > RFC 4512 Section 2.5.2. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

Hi, Am 27.10.2015 um 11:00 Uhr schrieb Howard Chu: > Marc Patermann wrote: >> Am 24.10.2015 um 07:24 Uhr schrieb Howard Chu: >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>>> --On Friday, October 23, 2015 1:15 PM -0700 Jason Whitener >>>> <jwhitene(a)pcc.edu&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I had a multi-valued attribute like >>>>> cn: var0:value >>>>> cn: var2:value >>>>> cn: var3:value >>>> >>>> I think you're looking for the valsort overlay. Read the man >>>> page for slapo-valsort >>> >>> If each of those are just arbitrary tags, and not for ordering >>> purposes, then just using an attribute tag might be the better >>> option. >>> >>> cn;var0: value >>> cn;var2: value >>> cn;var3: value >>> >> regarding LDAP and tags I only found this RFC: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3866 >> >> But it is about languages tags only. Section 1.3 speaks about >> "cn;x-bar", so >> this is for arbitrary tags? >> Is this what you meant or can you point me to something else? > > RFC 4512 Section 2.5.2. Two questions: uidnumber is singelvalue. with uidnumber;x-foo: 1 I can set a second uidnumber value to an object. Is this intented or a bug?

With cn: test cn;x-bar: bar cn;x-foo: foo I can search for (cn=*) -> 3 values (cn;x-=*) -> 2 values (cn;x-bar=*) -> 1 value How can I search for the one attribute without a tag?