Ulrich Windl wrote:
Howard Chu hyc@symas.com schrieb am 15.05.2014 um 05:14 in Nachricht
There's no point in people writing email replies to you if you're incapable of reading. If you're unwilling to read information that people provide you in links, you're just wasting everyone's time.
But there's also no point in writing replies like "it's documented" (as if the writer has found it) without giving the proof (i.e.: URI). Finding such a response in a mailing list archive is just as useless IMHO. (You may supress the flame that usually follows such replies).
You will note that I always specify where something is documented. In this case:
If you didn't read the debates from the openldap-devel mailing list back when this was first covered, you've got no business rehashing the conversation now. If you didn't actually spend any of your own time writing code to test an approach, failing, and trying another approach, you've got no right to demand any particular implementation from anyone else.
Which you can plainly see in the archive http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201405/msg00105.html