On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.comwrote:
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:03 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli < marco.pizzoli@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Quanah,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Monday, October 29, 2012 8:52 AM +0100 Marco Pizzoli marco.pizzoli@gmail.com wrote:
If I try to configure a second replica configration targeted directly to (in example) to ou=ou3, then that ou get replicated.
Any help/advice is welcome.
Hi Marco,
You have not provided any useful information with which to help you, so there is not really any advice one can offer you. I.e., you have not provided the configuration you are using on your master and replicas in the scenario where you have multiple DBs.
You are absolutely right and I'm aware of it... The problem is in this case I can't provide any (even similar to)real configuration. Both from technical limitation (remote server with no possibility of copy/paste) and corporate policy*.
- Continuing experimenting I found also 2 or 3 cases in which I'm able to
crash OL 2.4.33 (in one case by simply slapadding using back-mdb) but I CAN'T provide any material to file a "valid" ITS. I'm sorry about that.
Hi Marco,
Your corporate policy sounds so severe, I'm surprised you can even send email indicating you have faced any issues. Without an ability to provide useful information, I don't believe there is any way anyone can help you.
I would suggest you find a way to comply with your corporate policy while providing useful information. Since I don't know what that policy is, it is hard to know what you might do, but I'd hope you could supply your configs minus any passwords and specific schema/attrs or something (i.e., make generic configs that illustrate the issues you are facing). That's what I generally do.
If you require confidentiality, I would suggest a support agreement with Symas that includes an NDA.
Quanah, I appreciate you always answering my requests, but in this case my only question was if the problem I was facing is a known issue (at least in OL2.3 we know it was). If not, it could be my fault in the configuration. Maybe someone had a similar problem and could share his experience. By not being able to provide useful configuration snippets, I *have not* asked for a specific help.
With your answers, do I have to assume that with OL2.4.x you never faced a problem syncrepl-ing a tree composed by multiple db's, testing both scenarios (more or less) similar to the two I presented from a (very) high-level-view perspective?
Thanks again Marco