RE: LDAP Writes are not propagated to mirror nodes.

-- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry@suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ <quote who="K C, Sachin \(Sachin\)"> > > > It is not working on 2.4.8 as well, Gavin. > Configuration files look just fine. Isn't it? > > Has anybody tried this on solaris 10? > > -Sachin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gavin Henry [mailto:ghenry@suretecsystems.com] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:04 PM > To: K C, Sachin (Sachin) > Cc: Howard Chu; openldap-technical@openldap.org > Subject: Re: LDAP Writes are not propagated to mirror nodes. > > K C, Sachin (Sachin) wrote: >> >> Tried syncprov directive before all database directives. Me getting >> the following error. >> >> @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.7 (Feb 22 2008 15:29:49) $ syncprov must be >> instantiated within a database. >> slapd stopped. >> connections_destroy: nothing to destroy. >> >> Thanks >> Sachin >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gavin Henry [mailto:ghenry@suretecsystems.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:12 PM >> To: Howard Chu >> Cc: K C, Sachin (Sachin); openldap-technical@openldap.org >> Subject: Re: LDAP Writes are not propagated to mirror nodes. >> >> <quote who="Howard Chu"> >>> K C, Sachin (Sachin) wrote: >>>> Tried this as well. No satisfactory results :( >>>> >>>> -Sachin >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Gavin Henry [mailto:ghenry@suretecsystems.com] >>>> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:53 PM Try the overlay syncprov >>>> stuff before the syncrepl directives. >>> That is clearly wrong. "syncrepl" is a database-specific directive. >>> Overlay >>> directives are supposed to come after all of the regular database >>> directives. >> >> It can be applied globally to all databases no? That's why I said >> before the syncrepl directive, meaning before the database section/s > > Yeah, sorry about that. > > Can you try with 2.4.8 with the same setup as before (not the one you > just tried)? > > > >