Zdenek Styblik wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Zdenek Styblik wrote:
>> my question is regarding updated Cosine schema [RFC 4524] which has been
>> accepted in March 1991 by IANA. This obsoletes previous Cosine schema
>> [RFC 1274].
>> OpenLDAP has support for RFC 4524, yet it comes with pre-defined older
>> RFC 1274.
> Could you please elaborate on which specific problems you see with
> cosine.schema shipped with OpenLDAP (despite the outdated comment and
> DESC texts)?
I've re-checked RFC again, and you are correct. Judging by Appendix A, I
probably got confused by X.500 names and LDAPs shortened ones, as I'm
looking for solution/ideas in both [LDAP/X.500 RFCs].
Your question was perfectly valid. It showed that cosine.schema would
need some editorial changes to be updated to RFC 4524 (comments etc.).
I've filed ITS#6151 for that. My question was whether you see any real
compability issues with the schema descriptions.