Suppose a name form is attached to a structural object class. Then, when
referring to entries belonging to that object class (which has no DIT
Structure Rules associated to it), is using the MUST attributes as
defined in the name form to construct AVA still necessary?
No DIT Structure Rules refer to this name form.
Thanks for your response. I'm surprised Ubuntu's most recent LTS is
shipping such an old version of OpenLDAP!
I just built and installed 2.4.40 packages on Ubuntu 14.04 from Debian
Jesse's 2.4.40 source. Unfortunately slapd returns the same results as
2.4.31 and a packet capture shows the same binding behavior.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>
> --On Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:32 PM -0700 Ryan Lovett <rylo(a)berkeley.edu>
>> I've setup a simple proxy so that local LDAP clients can get access to
>> protected attributes on a remote server. My proxy is slapd 2.4.31 with
>> What am I doing wrong? Any advice is greatly appreciated!
> The first thing you're doing wrong is running a version of OpenLDAP that
> is so ancient.
> OpenLDAP 2.4.31 Release (2012/04/21)
> I.e., it's over 3 years old.
> There have been multiple fixes to slapd-ldap since that release. This one
> in particular may be related:
> OpenLDAP 2.4.33 Release (2012/10/10)
> Fixed slapd-ldap idassert bind handling (ITS#7403)
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Platform Architect
> Zimbra, Inc.
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration