We are having an issue with some users not replicating to all of servers. I have MMR setup with three nodes and there are a few times that a user is has an attribute changed, i.e. supervisor, and the change is replicated to one server and not to another. So the information is correct on 2 of 3 servers. My question is this after running a very long diff against two ldif's created by slapcat of the replication database. Shouldn't the replication databases be the same? The issues do happen with every change and every user, just a few times.
I am n ot on the latest version and I cannot upgrade to the latest version with a better kernel until our staff upgrades our VM server due to migration issues with the kernel I would like have. We are on ubuntu 12.04 and if we can get the VM server updated soon we will start testing 14.04 when it is released.
Any suggestions on a good way to test besides the obvious of turning on logging for sync which I have done in out test environment for now.
Thanks, Eric Speake Web Systems Administrator O'Reilly Auto Parts (417) 862-2674 Ext. 1975
This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS � 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:19 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
I am n ot on the latest version and I cannot upgrade to the latest version with a better kernel until our staff upgrades our VM server due to migration issues with the kernel I would like have. We are on ubuntu 12.04 and if we can get the VM server updated soon we will start testing 14.04 when it is released.
What version are you on? Are you using plain syncrepl or delta-syncrepl for MMR?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Thanks, Eric Speake Web Systems Administrator O'Reilly Auto Parts (417) 862-2674 Ext. 1975
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com To: espeake@oreillyauto.com, openldap-technical@openldap.org Date: 03/13/2014 12:40 PM Subject: Re: Question on replication files. Sent by: openldap-technical-bounces@OpenLDAP.org
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:19 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
I am n ot on the latest version and I cannot upgrade to the latest
version
with a better kernel until our staff upgrades our VM server due to migration issues with the kernel I would like have. We are on ubuntu 12.04 and if we can get the VM server updated soon we will start testing 14.04 when it is released.
What version are you on? Are you using plain syncrepl or delta-syncrepl for MMR?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. Message id: 08343601410.AD0DD
This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS � 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com To: espeake@oreillyauto.com Cc: openldap-technical-bounces@openldap.org, openldap-technical@openldap.org Date: 03/13/2014 01:16 PM Subject: Re: Question on replication files. Sent by: openldap-technical-bounces@OpenLDAP.org
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
--Quanah
We are working towards an upgrade with a couple of questions. We have two very write intensive applications that run at night touch 60,000+ records. Is MMR the best way with a large number of rights like this? or would a master-slave configuration work better.
Also, is there a tool or a way to make the nodes go back and check for records that might need to updated still? I am going to diff the the databases, is there a way to force the servers to check again on records that might not be changed to compare the CSN's?
Thanks so much, Eric
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. Message id: C084960141C.AEC8C
This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS � 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.03.2014 um 19:03 in
Nachricht <34E9E18C6D0A7C6D92162635@[192.168.1.46]>:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
I'm sure this bug is already fixed in newer version from other conversations I have had. We are limited while waiting for hardware upgrades. Things like upgrading the kernerl has to wait.
Eric Speake Web Systems Administrator O'Reilly Auto Parts (417) 862-2674 Ext. 1975
From: "Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de To: openldap-technical-bounces@openldap.org, espeake@oreillyauto.com, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" quanah@zimbra.com Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org Date: 03/14/2014 03:27 AM Subject: Antw: Re: Question on replication files.
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.03.2014 um 19:03
in Nachricht <34E9E18C6D0A7C6D92162635@[192.168.1.46]>:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com
wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next
couple
of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. Message id: 1450C601424.A5E8C
This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS � 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:27:10 +0100 schrieb "Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de:
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.03.2014 um 19:03 in
Nachricht <34E9E18C6D0A7C6D92162635@[192.168.1.46]>:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
Rubbish, have you ever seen a Debian or Ubuntu maintainer posting to this mailing list? Actually there is no qualified Debian or Ubuntu maintainer.
-Dieter
Dieter Klünterdieter@dkluenter.de schrieb am 14.03.2014 um 21:50 in
Nachricht 20140314215009.33f39aee@pink.avci.de:
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:27:10 +0100 schrieb "Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de:
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.03.2014 um 19:03 in
Nachricht <34E9E18C6D0A7C6D92162635@[192.168.1.46]>:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
A: >> One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
B: > Rubbish, have you ever seen a Debian or Ubuntu maintainer posting to
this mailing list?
C: > Actually there is no qualified Debian or Ubuntu maintainer.
What has A to do with B, and how can you conclude C from A or B?
Ulrich
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:03:22AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian.
Please watch your language: it was the OpenLDAP project that released this "crap" a while ago.
Greetings Marc
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
--Quanah
Back to one of my original questions. In looking at the diff of the data I can see where the CSN and timestamps are different where the issue occurs. Is there a way to have the nodes scan for the differences and update the files to the latest record?
Thanks, Eric --
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. Message id: C084960141C.AEC8C
This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS � 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
openldap-technical@openldap.org
-
Dieter Klünter -
espeake＠oreillyauto.com -
Marc Haber -
Quanah Gibson-Mount -
Ulrich Windl