ldap.conf # TLS certificates (needed for GnuTLS) TLS_CACERT /etc/ldap/ssl/ca-cert.pem TLS_CERT /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldapsearch.crt TLS_KEY /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldapsearch.key TLS_REQCERT hard

As far as i can see and found info my client and servers TLS settings are configured properly. What i really don't get is that the client doesnt send his certs to the server.

On 04/20/15 20:07 +0200, E.therepa wrote: >Dear Tech list, > >I'd like to use CRL's to regulate client connections to my slapd server. >So i've build working certs and keys with gnutls. The whole keysetup is tested and working properly, >by invoking gnu-serv and gnu-cli i could succesfully create connections and drop clients in my revocation list. > >In order to use this in slapd/ldap utils i use this settings, > >slapd.conf, >TLSCACertificateFile /etc/ldap/ssl/ca-cert.pem >TLSCertificateFile /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldap.crt >TLSCertificateKeyFile /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldap.key >TLSCRLFile /etc/ldap/ssl/crl.pem >TLSCipherSuite SECURE256:-VERS-SSL3.0 >TLSVerifyClient hard > >ldap.conf ># TLS certificates (needed for GnuTLS) >TLS_CACERT /etc/ldap/ssl/ca-cert.pem >TLS_CERT /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldapsearch.crt This is a user only option. See ldap.conf(5). >TLS_KEY /etc/ldap/ssl/clients/lrc-ldapsearch.key >TLS_REQCERT hard > >Slapd debug, >55353d59 slapd starting >55353d5b conn=1000 fd=16 ACCEPT from IP=10.50.2.12:50764 (IP=0.0.0.0:636) >TLS: can't accept: No certificate was found.. >55353d5b conn=1000 fd=16 closed (TLS negotiation failure) > >ldapsearch debug, >ldap_start_tls: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) >ldap_free_connection 1 1 >ldap_send_unbind >ber_flush2: 7 bytes to sd 4 > 0000: 30 05 02 01 02 42 00 0....B. >ldap_write: want=7 error=Broken pipe >ldap_free_connection: actually freed > > >As far as i can see and found info my client and servers TLS settings are configured properly. >What i really don't get is that the client doesnt send his certs to the server. -- Dan White

--On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:18 AM +0200 Enterprise Spirit <ldaptech+Etherape(a)kernelbug.org&gt; wrote: > Howard Chu, > If you allow me to ask you something about gnutls directly, do you still > stand behind the statement you made here, > http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200802/msg00072.html > > i know it's out of date but you said 'the code is fundamentally broken'. > I'm not knowledged about the internals of gnutls but i am very cusious if > you changed your mind since then. It's funny you ask... There was a spirited debate with one of the GnuTLS author's a while back about this, as they blogged that Howard was incorrect. Howard pointed out on the blog (<http://nmav.gnutls.org/2011/05/is-really-gnutls-considered-harmful.html >) that he was in fact still correct, and gave examples. After which the GnuTLS author deleted the entire conversation off of his blog, and locked it down. That, to me, says worlds about how "safe" one can consider GnuTLS.