12:52 a.m.
hi list,
is it possible to write a filter like:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(mail=cn))
to retrieve all entry that attribute mail equal to attribute cn.
thanks
6:08 a.m.
On 03/05/2014 02:52 AM, Lanfeust troy wrote:
hi list,
is it possible to write a filter like:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(mail=cn))
to retrieve all entry that attribute mail equal to attribute cn.
thanks
I have never tried it, but I bet not. For starters I don't see how the
interpreter would be able to tell that your value on the right side of
the = is an attribute name and not a value to compare to.
--
Andy Dorman
8:27 a.m.
Am 05.03.2014 09:52, schrieb Lanfeust troy:
hi list,
is it possible to write a filter like:
(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(mail=cn))
to retrieve all entry that attribute mail equal to attribute cn.
thanks
No, RFC 4515 does not define such. On the right side of the operator
("filtertype") an attribute value ("assertionvalue") is expected and
not
an attribute type ("attr" which is "attributedescription").
"attr" is
only is expected on the left side of the operator:
simple = attr filtertype assertionvalue
You will need a little scripting to achieve what you want.
Cheers,
Peter
--
Peter Gietz, CEO
DAASI International GmbH
Europaplatz 3
D-72072 Tübingen
Germany
phone: +49 7071 407109-0
fax: +49 7071 407109-9
email: peter.gietz(a)daasi.de
web: www.daasi.de
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Tübingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 382175
Geschäftsleitung: Peter Gietz
9:35 a.m.
Peter Gietz wrote:
Am 05.03.2014 09:52, schrieb Lanfeust troy:
> hi list,
>
> is it possible to write a filter like:
>
> (&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(mail=cn))
>
> to retrieve all entry that attribute mail equal to attribute cn.
>
> thanks
No, RFC 4515 does not define such. On the right side of the operator
("filtertype") an attribute value ("assertionvalue") is expected and
not
an attribute type ("attr" which is "attributedescription").
"attr" is
only is expected on the left side of the operator:
> simple = attr filtertype assertionvalue
You will need a little scripting to achieve what you want.
Or propose an extended matching rule, write a spec for it, and get some code
written to implement it. For this particular use case it probably wouldn't be
too hard.
Cheers,
Peter
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
3563
days inactive
3563
days old
openldap-technical@openldap.org
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andy Dorman -
Howard Chu -
Lanfeust troy -
Peter Gietz