Hello,

I'm trying to merge the objectClass attribute between a central LDAP server and a local one which is using translucent overlay. I have configured the overlay with

translucent_remote objectClass translucent_local objectClass

If i issue a query like

ldapsearch -D "cn=cdstaff,dc=unl,dc=pt" -b "ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt" -h localhost -W -x "(cn=cpd_srv_adm)"

i get

# extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt> with scope subtree # filter: (cn=cpd_srv_adm) # requesting: ALL #

# 637, grupos, fct.unl.pt dn: uniqueIdentifier=637,ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt displayName: Admins Servidores ADM cn: cpd_srv_adm uniqueIdentifier: 637 gidNumber: 1637 member: uniqueIdentifier=18172,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt member: uniqueIdentifier=18272,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt member: uniqueIdentifier=15093,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: grupoUNL objectClass: posixGroup

# search result search: 2 result: 0 Success

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

but then, if i change the filter to also use objectClass like

ldapsearch -D "cn=cdstaff,dc=unl,dc=pt" -b "ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt" -h localhost -W -x "(&(objectClass=*)(cn=cpd_srv_adm))"

i get

# extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt> with scope subtree # filter: (&(objectClass=*)(cn=cpd_srv_adm)) # requesting: ALL #

# 637, grupos, fct.unl.pt dn: uniqueIdentifier=637,ou=grupos,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt displayName: Admins Servidores ADM cn: cpd_srv_adm uniqueIdentifier: 637 gidNumber: 1637 member: uniqueIdentifier=18172,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt member: uniqueIdentifier=18272,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt member: uniqueIdentifier=15093,ou=agentes,dc=fct,dc=unl,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: grupoUNL objectClass: posixGroup

# search result search: 2 result: 32 No such object

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

which apparently works, but do notice that it also reports result: 32 No such object

If i try the query in another client, like phpldapadmin or even luma, i'm only presented with the error message.

Is this a bug?

Best regards,

Hugo Monteiro.