Re: Antw: Re: [Q] amendments to schemes existent

Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote:

But you are basically changing the semantics of attribute authorizedService: Before "*" was literal, after it is magic (substring match).

The discussion on which variant is more useful is a different issue ;-)

for *my* flow, the variant of original schema is unusable since I have pleny of values and to hardcode all of them for all available searches is not good idea, to my mind ...

if to return to the starting question:

is there other way to get originally SUBSTR-less attributes to be matchable by substring, except hacking the scheme?