Re: Antw: Re: [Q] amendments to schemes existent
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
But you are basically changing the semantics of attribute
authorizedService:
Before "*" was literal, after it is magic (substring match).
The discussion on which variant is more useful is a different issue ;-)
for *my* flow, the variant of original schema is unusable since I have
pleny of values and to hardcode all of them for all available searches
is not good idea, to my mind ...
if to return to the starting question:
is there other way to get originally SUBSTR-less attributes to be
matchable by substring, except hacking the scheme?
--
Zeus V. Panchenko jid:zeus@im.ibs.dn.ua
IT Dpt., I.B.S. LLC GMT+2 (EET)
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 162 bytes)