8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
4:35 p.m.
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:quanah@zimbra.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 8:22 AM
I use writemap and nometasync. I've never encountered corruption because of using writemap.
Excellent. Do you use nometasync because otherwise the performance isn't good enough for your use case? Or just because you like better performance in general, and the risk of one lost transaction seems a reasonable trade-off? Do you need a checkpoint directive with nometasync?
Thanks.