On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
--On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen alexm@ndtel.com wrote:
Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be?
Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to have a basic structural objectClass.
Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural objectclass specification in my experience.
The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:
dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc objectClass: top objectClass: extensibleObject uidNumber: 55083
'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object classes.
Philip Guenther