Am Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:02:23 +0000 schrieb "Bannister, Mark" Mark.Bannister@morganstanley.com:
Hi Michael,
If we're primarily adding or deleting entire objects, however, not modifying single attributes, won't delta-syncrepl just fall back to syncrepl anyway?
Can't you change your modification process to modify entries instead of deleting and re-adding them?
I didn't say we deleted and re-added stuff. We will modify if the object needs modifying, but most of our operations involve either adding brand new objects, or deleting old ones.
And this still doesn't change the fact that I'm now going to have to spin up 10-20 LDAP replicas on a single machine to get around the single-threaded replication engine problem.
This is the concept of "replication hubs". You can do this to spread the syncrepl load.
Ah, "replication hubs", yes. I'd rather not have to go down this route unless I have to, but at the moment it seems there is little choice.
You may consider cascading replication, as demonstrated in test019
-Dieter