Michael Ströder wrote:
Nik Svoboda wrote:
I have noticed that in the openldap system I am using, the schema has a missing syntax. This syntax is "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58" ; "Substring Assertion".
According to CVS, Substring Assertion was added to OpenLDAP on 2007-May-17. Your version of OpenLDAP must be extremely old.
This is referenced in matching types using partial matching of strings (exactsubstringsmatch, numericStringSubstringsMatch, ...). I am fairly new to these subjects and do not understand fully how they operate.
What do you mean which "matching types"? "Matching rules" or "attribute types"?
Is there a way to correct this?
Depends on what you really want to achieve. Can you tell us? Looking into RFC 2252 and RFC 3698 I cannot imagine what you want.
Are the syntaxes and matching types specified in a way that can be modified dynamically?
Syntaxes and their matching rules have to be coded in C. There's no dynamic configuration for these.
Not yet, I suppose. Eventually, in Forth. http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html