Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:48:37 +0100 (CET)
schrieb Christian Kratzer <ck-lists(a)cksoft.de>:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Dieter Klünter wrote:
> Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:31:09 +0100 (CET)
> schrieb Christian Kratzer <ck-lists(a)cksoft.de>:
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Dieter Klünter wrote:
>>> Michael is quite correct in his comments regarding slapo_policy,
>>> but in priciple i have realised this design in a cascading
>>> directory with more than 100 slaves.
>> read only slaves or slaves with full write access ?
>> The latter is the thing I need and the thing I am concerned about.
> read, and write operations by chaining.
chaining seems to block on a global lock for olcConnectionTimeout
when connectivity to the referral servers is lost. This took down
the customers slaves with chaining when a network issue separated the
slaves from the masters.
See my other post about a week ago.
I would need at least one or at best two masters servers per site as
a target for chaining to cater for network partitions.
An option would be to fix the chaining issues.
Thinking about my options I wanted to explore the other option of
having the clients on MMR masters. Also those MMR masters would not
be fully meshed with the other sites.
I am quite aware of your posts. Please note that i have set up a
cascading directory design.
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
GPG Key ID:DA147B05