6 Aug
2011
6 Aug
'11
7:30 a.m.
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Le 6 août 2011 15:49, "Michael Ströder" <michael@stroeder.com mailto:michael@stroeder.com> a écrit :
harry.jede@arcor.de mailto:harry.jede@arcor.de wrote:
The cleanest approach is to modify your OU entries:
objectClass: top objectClass: organizationalUnit objectClass: extensibleObject
Now, all attributes which are defined in any schema are allowed :-) .
That's what I consider bad advice and definitely not the cleanest approach.
This is equivalent to your solutions 1 and 2, described 3 days ago.
No, it's not since 'extensibleObject' is a special auxiliary object class actually circumventing schema checking. I proposed to use a custom auxiliary object class specifically allowing the needed attributes.
Ciao, Michael.