7:03 a.m.
Le 6 août 2011 15:49, "Michael Ströder" <michael(a)stroeder.com> a écrit :
harry.jede(a)arcor.de wrote:
> The cleanest approach is to modify your OU entries:
>
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: organizationalUnit
> objectClass: extensibleObject
>
> Now, all attributes which are defined in any schema are allowed :-) .
That's what I consider bad advice and definitely not the cleanest
approach.
This is equivalent to your solutions 1 and 2, described 3 days ago.
7:30 a.m.
New subject: Customizing organizationalUnit
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Le 6 août 2011 15:49, "Michael Ströder" <michael(a)stroeder.com
<mailto:michael@stroeder.com>> a écrit :
>
> harry.jede(a)arcor.de <mailto:harry.jede@arcor.de> wrote:
> > The cleanest approach is to modify your OU entries:
> >
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalUnit
> > objectClass: extensibleObject
> >
> > Now, all attributes which are defined in any schema are allowed :-) .
>
> That's what I consider bad advice and definitely not the cleanest approach.
This is equivalent to your solutions 1 and 2, described 3 days ago.
No, it's not since 'extensibleObject' is a special auxiliary object class
actually circumventing schema checking. I proposed to use a custom auxiliary
object class specifically allowing the needed attributes.
Ciao, Michael.
7:36 a.m.
New subject: Customizing organizationalUnit
Le 6 août 2011 16:30, "Michael Ströder" <michael(a)stroeder.com> a écrit :
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
>
> Le 6 août 2011 15:49, "Michael Ströder" <michael(a)stroeder.com
> <mailto:michael@stroeder.com>> a écrit :
>>
>> harry.jede(a)arcor.de <mailto:harry.jede@arcor.de> wrote:
>> > The cleanest approach is to modify your OU entries:
>> >
>> > objectClass: top
>> > objectClass: organizationalUnit
>> > objectClass: extensibleObject
>> >
>> > Now, all attributes which are defined in any schema are allowed :-) .
>>
>> That's what I consider bad advice and definitely not the cleanest
approach.
>
> This is equivalent to your solutions 1 and 2, described 3 days ago.
No, it's not since 'extensibleObject' is a special auxiliary object class
actually circumventing schema checking. I proposed to use a custom
auxiliary
object class specifically allowing the needed attributes.
Sorry, my fault, I didn't know this class. If it disables schema checking,
then you're right, it's bad.
3819
days inactive
3819
days old
openldap-technical@openldap.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Erwann ABALEA -
Michael Ströder