Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:51:02PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:

You need to actually use microseconds, since the time-increment is only unique on the local server and will not guarantee uniqueness in a replication scenario.

Attached is an updated patch for this ITS which uses microseconds rather than the time-increment, maintains the semantics of "now" being when the code is called rather than when the operation began, and copies the first timestamp to create a second with microseconds rather than redundantly calling slapd_timestamp.

Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be fixed or changed.

Thanks...