28 Apr
2014
28 Apr
'14
6:39 p.m.
From: Michael Ströder Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 11:22 PM
Yes, there's already an ITS present for that:
Hmm, I see that was opened over two years ago and as of yet still has no response :(.
It would appear the generalized time syntax the attribute is defined as supports fractional seconds, and in the draft RFC I don't see any specific requirement that the timestamp be at a per second granularity as opposed to hundreds of a second or thousands of a second. I will need to go review the actual code to see if this is something more complicated than it would initially appear, but I think at this point I'm going to try to fix this myself. Hopefully such an enhancement would be accepted into the official version.
Thanks