--On Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:21 AM +0200 Stelios Grigoriadis stelios.xx.grigoriadis@ericsson.com wrote:
After running some test we observed that slapd is consuming a considerable amount of memory, why is that? We ran one client that retrieved the entire tree (it was pretty small anyway) and 10 other clients that searched for a particular item. Comparing version 2.3.39 with 2.3.32 the footprint increases. From top:
Is this to be expected? By decreasing the cachesize we got:
The following things affect the size of slapd:
BDB cache size in DB_CONFIG Number of file descriptors made available to slapd Entry cache (cachesize in slapd.conf) idlcachesize (in slapd.conf)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration