15 May
2014
15 May
'14
12:12 p.m.
Howard Chu wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:
Quoting Dieter Klünter dieter@dkluenter.de:
The attribute type is openLDAPaci. The model is based on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-08
Does this FAQ-O-Matic still represent the current situation regarding the semantics and not recommended for general use?
Yes.
Given the power of OpenLDAP ACLs in the normal configuration I also do not see any real need for in-directory ACLs anymore. set-based ACLs could be a bit faster though (see my other posting). :-)
Ciao, Michael.