27 Sep
2012
27 Sep
'12
3:21 a.m.
Roman Rybalko wrote:
25.09.2012 01:31, Howard Chu пишет:
Aside from the equality index, there's not much else to be done. I'd suggest you pull the code in RE24 and see how back-mdb performs with your data.
Pulled 2a68553ec103eec28237c2608b3fea149a492b76 Tried mdb - works completely the same way.
Looks to me like it's 4-5x faster.....
(&(logTime>=20120816200001+0400)(logTime<=20120816200501+0400)) - 12sec (|(logTime=20120816200001+0400)(logTime=20120816200501+0400)) - 0.01sec ~ 100000 objects in db
Should I rely only on (|(=)(=)(=)(=)...) filters ?
If that suits you, sure. Personally I would submit an enhancement request to the ITS about getting this indexing code restructured. Ideally with a patch attached, fixing it as desired.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/