Re: [EXT] Re: Q: "monitor_back_register_entry("cn=Consumer 112,cn=Database 1,cn=Databases,cn=Monitor"): entry exists"

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 01:50:24PM +0000, Windl, Ulrich wrote:

Ondřej,

Good spotting!

Actually I had a duplicate rid=112 in olcSyncrepl, but I never would have thought that monitor_back_register_entry is related to syncrepl. Problem was caused by a configuration script using the wrong variable...

Hi Ulrich, the code expects that rids are unique in a server (and documents as such), there is nothing to check that you have complied with this requirement but I would expect your replication might be impacted as well if you configured it thus.

The consumer status is also exported via cn=monitor, which had a conflict claiming the monitor DN as you just saw.

Regards,