Hi,
If it was simply writing to the memory map, shouldn't memory usage decrease as soon as everything is written? The memory usage continuous to be high for as long as the database is open, even if the program just waits afterwards. Is that to be expected as well? Because that would mean that the process would simply run out of memory if more data is writting than the machine has as ram.
Regards, Luc
Met vriendelijke groeten, Luc Vlaming KXA Software Innovations
voorheen Dysi Software Innovations
bezoekadres: Hoendiep Noordzijde 21 9843TG, Grijpskerk
Luc Vlaming tel: 06 16 353 426 email: vlaming@softwareinnovations.nl url: www.softwareinnovations.nl
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Luc Vlaming wrote:
Hi,
Currently I am creating support for using LMDB as a new storage backend for one of our products. At the moment I am testing import bulk data into lmdb using transactions that span a single record of 10MB. The total db size afterwards is 5GB. I also tested with records of 1MB.
I noticed a very odd thing: when using the MDB_WRITEMAP option, memory usage grows very quickly and linear with the amount of data stored into the database. (memory usage ends up a bit higher than 5GB). when not using MDB_WRITEMAP, however, memory usage stays very low. Does anyone have a suggestion what might be wrong and what causes such different behaviour with and without using the memorymap option?
There is nothing wrong. It is simply writing to the shared memory map.
-- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/