--On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:27 AM -0500 Christopher Wood
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:04:40PM +0100, Marco Nett wrote:
> 2013/12/10 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>
> --On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 11:08 AM -0600
> espeake(a)oreillyauto.com wrote:
> Do the slapcat on ldap2 and then delete the db files on ldap1 and
> then run
> the slapadd. �you will not get duplicates because all of the
> CSN's will be
> the same. �This is what I have done my migrations to the most
> recent versions and doing my own builds. �Works great that way.
Trying not to sound too obtuse, but still not grasping something about
The last time I had a master of a multimaster pair stay down for a while
I just turned the long-halted master back on. Eventually syncrepl did its
thing. I ldapsearch'd corresponding databases on both hosts,
sorted/diffed the outputs and found no differences in the output (both
masters had the same data).
So what's the difference between waiting for syncrepl and going to all
the effort that people are describing?
Speed? If you have a large database, waiting on syncrepl is going to take
Architect - Server
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration