13 Oct
2017
13 Oct
'17
7:55 a.m.
2017-10-13 16:25 GMT+02:00 Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com:
Dieter Klünter wrote:
slapo-unique(5) plus slapo-constraint(5)
Interesting, I hadn't that in mind. Unfortunately I think Michael is right that using a constraint in this scenario won't work. But I have other uses for slapo-contraint in mind already.
IMHO this does not work without adding all possible values to at least one of the attributes *or* SUP-ing all attribute values from a common attribute type.
How would attribute inheritance tie into this? I'm relatively free in modifying our ldap schema so making mailAlias SUP mail would be possible.
+Karsten