If OpenLDAP can run with this schema then why wasn't support for this feature created?
What's the recommend schema?
On Jul 21, 2017 1:44 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" quanah@symas.com wrote:
--On Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 PM -0400 Douglas Duckworth dod2014@med.cornell.edu wrote:
Am I rfc2307 or rfc2307bis? According to sssd-ldap man page:
Per nis.schema:
# Definitions from RFC2307 (Experimental) # An Approach for Using LDAP as a Network Information Service
so it is RFC2307 as opposed to RFC2307bis. Neither schema has ever made it past experimental.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A__www.symas.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9- RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=2Fzhh_78OGspKQpl_e-CbhH6xUjnRkaqPFUS2wTJ2cw&m= QjNwZbNvK3tkFCecwXFhz1ywKJbFr_zOd4L5bNHwKpc&s= M9eRNUisYljobqAKHQaLfans5QZ9DGU5Srnk8kR6mso&e= >
Douglas Duckworth wrote:
If OpenLDAP can run with this schema then why wasn't support for this feature created?
There is a contrib/ overlay but I'd not use it.
What's the recommend schema?
Simply start with groupOfNames.
Ciao, Michael.
On Jul 21, 2017 1:44 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" <quanah@symas.com mailto:quanah@symas.com> wrote:
--On Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 PM -0400 Douglas Duckworth <dod2014@med.cornell.edu <mailto:dod2014@med.cornell.edu>> wrote: > Am I rfc2307 or rfc2307bis? According to sssd-ldap man page: Per nis.schema: # Definitions from RFC2307 (Experimental) # An Approach for Using LDAP as a Network Information Service so it is RFC2307 as opposed to RFC2307bis. Neither schema has ever made it past experimental. --Quanah
openldap-technical@openldap.org
-
Douglas Duckworth -
Michael Ströder