I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl : - openldap version 2.4.23 - 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and 50 consumers on wan - The replication type is push - refreshAndPersist. - There are about 0.5 million nodes - The physical size of ldap folder is about 5gb. - All the lan servers have identical hardware configuration.
I have following problems/questions.
1. We observe that LDAP replication works better on one server as opposed to another in same LAN and having the same configuration ? Is ldap replication affected by the ldap read operations on the consumers? So if 2 consumers are getting different amount of ldap reads, will replication speed be different?
2. On a really busy ldap server, can replication slow down drastically?
3. We find that even though the contextcsn of provider & consumer is same - actually there are nodes which are different and there are nodes which are not added or deleted. So we have created a custom script which compares entrycsn's of each and every node. Is this ok ?
4. We are currently having about 60 consumers - is this too much ? What can be the max numbers of consumers ?
5. Sometimes we urgently need some particular node to be present on the consumer - for which we cannot wait - in that case we get ldif of that node from provider and do ldapadd on the consumer ( mirrormode is ON on the consumers ). Is this safe and correct or could it cause some side effects ?
Kindly help me in troubleshooting these issues. Right now I cant think of what server configuration I could provide so I dint give it in this mail so pls tell me if anyone needs some particular configuration.
Thanks and Regards, Amol Kulkarni.
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni amolkulkarni@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
This is your #1 issue.
- 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and 50 consumers on wan
This is your #2 issue.
Upgrade to a stable release. Use delta-syncrepl, which uses significantly less bandwidth than syncrepl.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
On 3/9/2012 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni amolkulkarni@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
This is your #1 issue. .. Upgrade to a stable release.
Can we get rid of the stable version on openldap.org, which still says "2.4.23" is the stable version?
ashish gawarikar wrote:
Can we get rid of the stable version on openldap.org, which still says "2.4.23" is the stable version?
How about following-up here?
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201111/msg00046.html
Ciao, Michael.
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 10:45 AM -0800 ashish gawarikar ashish@sendmail.com wrote:
On 3/9/2012 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni amolkulkarni@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
This is your #1 issue. .. Upgrade to a stable release.
Can we get rid of the stable version on openldap.org, which still says "2.4.23" is the stable version?
That will be resolved soon. Use 2.4.30 for now. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
openldap-technical@openldap.org