Yes .. it is the "case insensitive ORDERING match" the one not defined (in that RFC) for IA5String syntax ... nor for "case exact" ...
Ciao
-----Original Message----- From: Pierangelo Masarati [mailto:masarati@aero.polimi.it] Sent: viernes, 26 de junio de 2009 15:09 To: Hallvard B Furuseth Cc: Antonio Alonso; openldap-technical@openldap.org Subject: Re: Case Ignore Ordering matching rule for IA5 String sysntax ?
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
masarati@aero.polimi.it writes:
Basically, it should be something like the caseIgnore stuff for IA5 was absent in the RFC 225* series, and it was not added to the RFC 451* series because IA5 is essentially obsolete, directoryString should be used instead.
Well now. Extract from RFC 4517, table of contents: 4.2.7. caseIgnoreIA5Match
.................................30
4.2.8. caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch.......................31
I saw those. I meant the ordering stuff.
p.