Am Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:32:16 +0100 schrieb W.Siebert@t-systems.com:
Hello,
now I extended the schema and filter appears without of "?", but my problem still not solved:
slapd[20876]: ber_get_next on fd 8 failed errno=0 (Success) slapd[20876]: connection_read(8): input error=-2 id=1001, closing. Nov 28 20:27:39 walrhel5
If I send the same search with various LDAP-Browsers (Softerra, LDP, Perlscript...), all is OK.
I tried witch OpenLDAP version: 2.4.26 and 2.4.28
FullLog:
[...]
22:23:53 despcdarmradtest01 slapd[20876]: [rw] searchBase: "dc=meta,dc=pov" -> "dc=spcdom,dc=udb" Nov 29 22:23:53
]...]
22:23:53 despcdarmradtest01 slapd[20876]: [rw] searchBase: "dc=meta,dc=pov" -> "dc=metdom,dc=net" Nov 29 22:23:53
uri "ldap://10.11.11.112:389/dc=meta,dc=pov" suffixmassage "dc=meta,dc=pov" "dc=adwal,dc=corporate,dc=net" idassert-authzFrom "dn:*" idassert-bind bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=radiator,cn=Users,dc=adwal,dc=corporate,dc=net" credentials="XXXXXXX" mode=none
uri "ldap://10.11.11.114:389/dc=meta,dc=pov" suffixmassage "dc=meta,dc=pov" "dc=second,dc=crocus,dc=com" idassert-authzFrom "dn:*" idassert-bind bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=predator,cn=Users,dc=second,dc=crocus,dc=com" credentials="XXXXXXX" mode=none
check your suffixmassage rules and compare to the rewritten suffix.
-Dieter