Re: So I finally upgraded from slurpd...

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

--On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:40 PM +0200 Kolbjørn Barmen kolbjorn.barmen@uninett.no wrote:

...

Perhaps slapadd/slapd should be able to deal with such duplicate entries better, to make it more obivous what's wrong? I'm just saying :)

What options did you use with slapadd? If you used -q, this is probably expected. If you did not, I suggest filing an ITS, although slapadd is never really as strict as ldapadd will be. It is meant for loading LDIF created by an export, which should already be sane.

I did not use -q.

ITS submitted: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=6592

Thanks! :)