Ulrich Windl wrote:
Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com schrieb am 10.12.2014:
I thought the LDAP _protocol_ uses OIDs everywhere, and names are just for human users...?
Nope. One could regard this as design deficiency (in comparison to X.500).
I couldn't quite read it from there: The closest match I found was: "oid = descr / numericoid", but I was talking about the "on wire" protocol of LDAP. Are there really named objects and attributes?
You really ask to be spoon-fed.
Aren't you the one who claimed to write schema-aware LDAP client. If yes, then you should really know RFC 4512 by heart.
Is it really so hard for you to find the line "Examples of valid attribute descriptions:" in this particular section?
Ciao, Michael.
P.S.: You're one nonsense posting away from my killfile.