[...] I suggest an ITS be filed to strengthen misconfiguration detection.
My ITS will be ignored anyway. So better you should file one.
The suggestion actually was for the original poster, although I was admittedly replying to your message, with the original poster in CC.
However, I also find your pessimistic attitude inappropriate, since several ITSes submitted by you have been dealt with, and in many cases successfully addressed (i.e. the problem was solved, and the fix released). Currently there are 111 ITS in incoming; some have been there for years. Only few of them have been submitted by you. You seem to be a pretty good tester (I should say a dam..d good tester) as you can produce so many unusual conditions that can hardly be reproduced and thus successfully dealt with. Whenever possible, ITS submitted by you (as well as by others) have been dealt with based on developers' availability, competence in the specific area of the ITS and so. So I would be more optimistic. In any case, I'll open (and close) the ITS, as the fix is definitely trivial.
p.