There are no emotional reactions - there are simply statements that I won't be submitting to your condescending attitude. I have also been working in this same arena for 20 years and I have long ago found what is need to make large systems function. Perhaps if you would drop the zero-sum-game attitude wrt to your own consulting business and agree to see other points of view, we would advance the state of the art.
But I won't be asking you for approval as to which advice I can give. And that is basically the sum of what I told you personally as well.
-mike
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com wrote:
MJ J wrote:
You're right, except for the fact that deploying 2 lines of new code into production can still be a long process ;-) The phrase comes to mind: If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
You're free to decide to ignore good advice.
But you have to accept that someone might point out flaws in your solution to prevent other list readers falling into the same trap. Your emotional reactions on-list and off-list are completely inappropriate.
With security hat on: The sum of such loose ends make out the attack surface.
Personally even after almost 20 years with LDAP I'm a dwarf standing on the shoulder of giants. And I'm still learning.
In particular in the context of this discussion I'm happy that others wrote down protocol specs for improving robustness, e.g. RFC 4527 etc. Especially since I already had to track down read-after-write issues in replicated deployments with so-called enterprise software - which can take days.
Ciao, Michael.