Christian Kratzer wrote:
I was always intending to ask what the original use case for groupOfUniqueNames actually was as I totally fail to see the point in the uniqueMember attributes.
I see lots of people using it just because "oh yeas of course we want to have unique members".
Most people are using 'groupOfUniqueNames' *without* the UID part in 'uniqueMember' without further thinking just because it was the default in Netscape/iPlanet/SunOne Directory Server.
Ciao, Michael.