Re: Reentrant library question.

Michael Ströder wrote:

MS> Hmm, a backport 2.4.11 -> 2.4.7 does not sound good to me.

I meant "backport" in the Debian sense of building a newer version of a specific package (in this case OpenLDAP) for an older release of the distribution (Etch).

MS> Why don't you just take the upstream 2.4.11 code of OpenLDAP MS> for building the Debian packages? Or will you?

We did. Debian is shipping 2.4.10 in Lenny, but only 2.3.30 in Etch. We want to run 2.4.11 on Etch, at least for the time being.

Cheers

Duncan