"Brett @Google" brett.maxfield@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Dieter Kluenter dieter@dkluenter.de wrote:
SATOH Fumiyasu fumiyas@osstech.jp writes:
At Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:39:32 +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
[...]
[...]
This would seem reasonable complexity wise, but i was wondering, is there any way to skip the refresh phase, other in just ignoring the objects, waiting for the persist stage ?
[...]
An example based on ldapsearch: ldapsearch -E'!sync=ro/rid=042,csn=20090928054615.449093Z#000000#000#000000' -H ldap://localhost -b dc=example,dc=com -s sub "*" +
As a result you either get a sync done control, that is no modification to the database control: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.3 false MIQAAAADAQH/ or you get a syncInfo, a sync state control, the modified entries and an new cookie.
-Dieter